How will this impact P&T? Sometimes junior faculty are encouraged to publish in “Tier 1” journals in their field. This open access policy may restrict them from publishing their work in such journals if journal editors must agree to this policy.
What is the plan for input from students and staff? Will they be allowed to vote on his policy as well?
“Staff” should be changed to “Research associates”
What is the problem with making the policy “opt in” rather than applying for a waiver to opt out.?
In a free wheeling discussion in our faculty meeting last week; several faculty would strongly prefer an “opt in” policy
With regard to the following:
The Dean or Dean’s designate will waive application of the license for a particular scholarly writing or delay access for a specified period of time (i.e., embargo) upon express direction by an FS member.
If embargo is requested, will the FS determine the length of time for the embargo?
The Harvard model only requires final versions of scholarly articles. “The author’s final version—the version after the article has gone through peer review and the revisions responsive thereto and any further copyediting in which the author has participated—is the appropriate version to request for distribution.”
Will our draft and working versions of articles be excluded?
I am concerned that in the town hall we only got information about what is good about OA and there was an offering of a critique.
We are giving a lot of power to address disputes to a Dean and yet we have next to no voice in the hiring process.
I talked with one of my publishers today and they were very clear that they would not be able to go forward with a contract if there would be an open access expectation.
Please define what is meant by scholarly works- If I was asked for a defintition I would include grants, syllabi, data, and more into that category. If that is the case that would potentially create huge ethical problems, which would be even further complicated by the Presidents Executive order on Gender and Race Stereotyping.
What is disturbing about this process is the seemingly lack of control faculty have regarding where our work is disseminated. What if I am open to certain groups/outlets having access to my work, but not other groups?
At what point is it recommended we inform journals/publishers of this college policy when submitting manuscripts to them? For example, in the past, when I’ve tried to negotiate with journals after a paper was accepted about retaining copyright / eliminating embargoes on sharing post-prints, they have refused to budge on their own policies.
If we share this type of college policy upfront in a cover letter when first submitting to a journal/publisher, I wouldn’t want this policy to further deter publishers from considering our works in the first place… so I think it’s important for the college to reflect upon these issues upfront.
What is the definition of a scholarly writing?
Question received via email: I echo the definition question that Dean posted. We also have working papers we post and then replace as they are updated (noting the changes on new versions). Does this account for working papers?
How will AYS identify new publications by an FS member and will they receive notice of a work being added to AYS Open?
Will the university provide legal coverage to persons who are subject to litigation by a publisher for their objection to the AYS policy?
Can it be stipulated in the policy that all new hires will be explicitly informed of the policy as part of the on-boarding process?
Can the policy make clear that co-authors are included without their consent?
Will the exclusion of students from the policy mean that theses and dissertations will not be included?